top of page
Acquired Brain Injury Support Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Brain Injury Treatment Programs Neurorehabilitation Services Post-Concussion Syndrome Management Cognitive Therapy for Brain Injury Brain Injury Case Management Long-Term Effects of Brain Injury Brain Injury Recovery Resources Brain Injury Support Groups

Allegations of Corruption Rock Connecticut: Advocates Call for Federal Oversight Amid Concerns Over Medicaid and Social Services Mismanagement

Allegations of Corruption Rock Connecticut: Advocates Call for Federal Oversight Amid Concerns Over Medicaid and Social Services Mismanagement CGA General assembly medicaid

Allegations of Corruption Rock Connecticut: Advocates Call for Federal Oversight Amid Concerns Over Medicaid and Social Services Mismanagement


Hartford, CT — Allegations are emerging that Connecticut government officials, including those overseeing critical social service programs, may be aware of deep-seated corruption but have chosen to ignore or allow it for political or financial gain. Advocacy groups and whistleblowers are now demanding federal intervention, stating that these alleged actions represent a profound betrayal of public trust, the misuse of taxpayer dollars, and a failure to provide quality care to Connecticut’s most vulnerable populations.


Claims of Corruption and Ignored Mismanagement in DSS Programs

At the center of the controversy are Connecticut’s Department of Social Services (DSS) programs, particularly those related to Medicaid and the Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Waiver Program. These programs are funded by significant federal allocations and taxpayer dollars, meant to deliver essential services to vulnerable residents. Yet advocates, including human rights whistleblower David Medeiros, assert that DSS and state officials have systematically ignored or even allowed ongoing mismanagement and corruption within these programs.

“Connecticut’s leadership has had every opportunity to address these issues,” say national advocates. “If they are knowingly allowing corruption that benefits certain private interests or their own political gains, that’s not only a moral failing but potentially criminal.”


Legal Ramifications: If Officials Are Aware and Ignoring Corruption, Is It a Crime?

According to federal and state laws, knowingly allowing corruption or failing to report misuse of public funds can be classified as a criminal offense. Under 18 U.S.C. § 666 (theft or bribery concerning federally funded programs), public officials are prohibited from engaging in or ignoring corrupt activities that affect federally funded programs. Additionally, Connecticut General Statutes Chapter 939 on Bribery and Corrupt Influence prohibits public officials from using their offices for personal or political gain.

Legal analysts point out that Connecticut officials who knowingly allow corruption could be held liable under these statutes, especially if their inaction protects their political or financial interests at the expense of public welfare.


Whistleblower Suppression and Lack of Transparency

The alleged silencing of David Medeiros, who has exposed numerous issues within DSS programs, adds another layer to the controversy. Reports indicate that Medeiros faced suppression when he attempted to bring his findings to the Connecticut General Assembly, with officials reportedly blocking his testimony. This has raised concerns about whether Connecticut’s leadership is actively trying to prevent public disclosure of issues impacting Medicaid and other social services.

Advocates argue that this constitutes a violation of whistleblower protection laws and restricts free speech in public forums, with many calling this a form of obstruction aimed at maintaining political and financial interests.

“This suppression doesn’t just impact David Medeiros—it silences the voices of all Connecticut residents who rely on these programs and deserve to know where their taxpayer dollars are going,” said a Connecticut-based advocate.


Systemic Accountability Failures: 30 Years of Legislative Acknowledgment with No Action

Adding to the frustration is the fact that Connecticut’s General Assembly Appropriations Committee has been aware of DSS mismanagement for nearly 30 years. Families, advocates, and social workers have testified about delays, poor-quality care, and monopolistic practices within Medicaid and DSS programs. However, despite acknowledgment of these issues, the committee has failed to implement substantial reforms, which advocates argue shows a failure of leadership and a possible culture of suppression.

“After 30 years of legislative acknowledgment, people are understandably outraged that the systemic issues are still unaddressed,” noted a representative from a national watchdog organization. “This is why federal oversight is essential. Connecticut’s government has had decades to correct these issues, and they’ve failed to protect the people they serve.”


Key Allegations and Evidence Advocates are Raising

  1. Suppression of Whistleblowers and Free Speech: Alleged suppression of David Medeiros and other whistleblowers who have tried to expose DSS mismanagement.

  2. Misuse of Federal and State Funds: Advocates assert that Medicaid and DSS funds are being misallocated, benefiting subcontracted companies over patient care.

  3. Failure to Adhere to FOIA and Transparency Laws: Reports indicate that Connecticut officials are failing to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), withholding key documents that could expose financial mismanagement.

  4. Potential Conflict of Interest and Political Benefits: Questions about whether officials or associated entities gain political or financial benefits from ignoring corruption within DSS programs.

  5. Impact on Vulnerable Populations: The alleged corruption and mismanagement directly impact those who rely on Medicaid and DSS programs, delaying essential services and lowering care standards.


Demand for Federal Oversight and Accountability

Given the gravity of the allegations, advocacy groups are urging federal agencies to step in and conduct a full investigation into Connecticut’s handling of federally funded programs. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Office of Inspector General (OIG), and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) are being called upon to examine potential mismanagement and ensure that taxpayer funds are used responsibly.

National and state advocates stress that oversight from CMS and OIG is necessary to protect public interests, ensure transparency, and restore public trust in Connecticut’s Medicaid and DSS programs.

“We’re calling for immediate federal intervention,” stated a Connecticut advocate. “The people of Connecticut deserve to know that their tax dollars are being spent on high-quality, ethical care for vulnerable residents—not lining the pockets of private companies or fueling political agendas.”


Public Trust at Stake

The actions taken by Connecticut’s leadership, particularly in blocking testimonies and suppressing whistleblowers, have raised questions about the commitment to public trust and transparency within the state’s legislative and executive branches. As news of the alleged corruption spreads, families, service providers, and advocates alike are left wondering if the officials they rely on will prioritize truth and accountability over personal and political interests.

The unfolding controversy threatens to erode public confidence in Connecticut’s government, as residents demand to know how their taxpayer dollars are being managed and if their elected officials are truly advocating for their needs.


Conclusion: A Call for Real Change and Transparency

As advocates press for federal intervention, the message is clear: Connecticut’s Medicaid programs need transparency, accountability, and reform. The alleged suppression of whistleblowers and potential misuse of funds represent serious threats to public welfare, and advocates nationwide are demanding immediate action to restore trust and ensure responsible governance.


The people of Connecticut, especially the vulnerable populations relying on DSS programs, deserve answers, accountability, and assurance that their voices will not be silenced.


 


Advocates Outraged as Connecticut Appropriations Committee Silences Whistleblower David Medeiros on Medicaid and Vulnerable Populations


Hartford, CT — Outrage is sweeping through the advocacy community following recent events in Connecticut’s General Assembly, where Cathy Osten, the head of the Appropriations Committee, reportedly silenced human rights activist and whistleblower David Medeiros during a public hearing. Advocates and families across the United States have expressed frustration, calling it a violation of free speech and due process, and decrying it as an unacceptable attempt to suppress crucial information regarding the use of federal Medicaid funds meant for vulnerable populations.


David Medeiros, a vocal advocate for transparency and human rights in government programs, was scheduled to address critical issues affecting Connecticut’s Medicaid-funded services at the public hearing. These issues include long-standing delays in care, declining service quality, and potential mismanagement within the Department of Social Services (DSS) that has left thousands of vulnerable residents without the support they need. But according to those present, Cathy Osten refused to allow Medeiros to fully present his findings, denying him and other Appropriations Committee members the opportunity to ask questions about his testimony.


National and Statewide Outcry Over Free Speech Suppression

Advocates are calling the incident a direct violation of whistleblower rights and an affront to public transparency. The General Assembly was presented with these concerns in 2023, yet advocates say the issues remain largely ignored. National human rights organizations and advocates from across the country are questioning how the Connecticut General Assembly (CGA) could allow such an infringement on free speech and due process to occur, particularly in a public forum meant to discuss the welfare of vulnerable populations.

“David Medeiros’ testimony was not just important—it was essential for shedding light on systemic issues within Connecticut’s Medicaid programs,” say national advocacy groups. “By silencing his voice, Cathy Osten and the CGA have shown a disregard for the public’s right to hear the truth about federal funds and how they’re being managed.”

Concerns Over Missing Key Figures, Including DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves

Adding fuel to the outrage was the absence of DSS Commissioner Andrea Barton Reeves from the hearing. Advocates and families had hoped to gain insights into the Department’s handling of Medicaid programs, especially given widespread complaints about excessive wait times and service limitations. DSS’s lack of representation at the hearing, coupled with Commissioner Barton Reeves’ absence, has left many feeling that the agency is avoiding accountability for issues that impact Connecticut’s most vulnerable.

Furthermore, advocates note that DSS representatives present at the hearing were unable to provide adequate information or updates on ongoing issues within Medicaid-funded programs. This lack of preparedness and transparency has only intensified advocates' frustrations, with many questioning whether DSS is committed to reforming its services.


A History of Ignoring Systemic Issues

Advocates highlight that the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee has been aware of these systemic issues for nearly 30 years. Despite acknowledgment of persistent challenges within DSS-managed programs, advocates argue that there has been little action to address or resolve these issues. Families, service providers, and advocates view this inaction as a failure of leadership, with Cathy Osten’s refusal to allow David Medeiros to speak only adding to the perception of a culture of suppression within the CGA.

“People have waited far too long for real change,” say a national advocacy groups. “To silence someone who’s speaking on behalf of vulnerable individuals and families undermines everything that public service stands for.”


Appropriations Committee Members were Denied the Right to Question Medeiros

In addition to silencing Medeiros, Osten reportedly barred other members of the Appropriations Committee from questioning him, further stifling open discussion on issues central to the hearing. This move has sparked criticism from other committee members who felt that Medeiros’ insights would have been valuable for understanding the extent of issues within Medicaid-funded programs and DSS.

According to sources, multiple representatives were prepared to ask Medeiros questions about his findings and recommendations for addressing the misuse of federal funds and improving services for vulnerable populations. Osten’s refusal to allow these questions has been interpreted by many as an attempt to shield DSS and the CGA from accountability.


Advocates Demand Accountability and Federal Oversight

The handling of the hearing has led advocates to call for federal oversight of Connecticut’s Medicaid programs. Many are urging national agencies, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), to investigate potential mismanagement and ensure that federal funds are used appropriately and transparently.


“It’s time for federal intervention,” stated a Connecticut-based advocate. “The people of Connecticut deserve to know how their taxpayer dollars are being spent, and the families relying on Medicaid services deserve better than years of inaction and suppression of critical information.”


Public Trust at Risk

The actions taken by Cathy Osten and the Connecticut General Assembly’s Appropriations Committee have raised serious concerns about transparency and accountability within state leadership. As news of the hearing spreads, many worry that these events will erode public trust in Connecticut’s legislative processes and hinder efforts to improve Medicaid-funded services.


Families, providers, and advocates are now left questioning whether their voices will ever be heard, as they continue to call on the CGA to prioritize accountability and provide meaningful solutions for the individuals and families most impacted by Connecticut’s Medicaid programs.


A Call for Real Change

Advocates nationwide are demanding that Connecticut’s leaders uphold the rights of whistleblowers and protect free speech in public forums, especially when discussing issues that impact vulnerable communities and federal funding. They are also calling on federal agencies to investigate Connecticut’s DSS programs and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used responsibly.


The message is clear: transparency, accountability, and public trust must be at the forefront of Connecticut’s Medicaid programs, and no voice speaking out for these values should ever be silenced.

 


We’re sharing an important message about systemic issues within Medicaid programs that may be impacting both vulnerable populations and every U.S. taxpayer. These challenges could have nationwide implications, affecting how federal dollars are spent and how services reach those who rely on Medicaid.


This is not about assigning blame—it’s about finding solutions that ensure taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need. By working together, we can help create a more transparent, accountable, and effective Medicaid system that benefits everyone.


Key Problems and Solutions:

Misuse of Taxpayer Funds

Problem: Federal Medicaid funds are being inefficiently used, which can increase costs for taxpayers while reducing the quality of services for vulnerable individuals.

Solution: Conduct regular audits of Medicaid spending to ensure that every dollar is used efficiently to support essential services and avoid waste or misallocation.


Lack of Transparency

Problem: Essential information about Medicaid services—such as provider directories and funding allocations—is not easily accessible to the public. This lack of transparency prevents people from understanding how funds are being used and how care decisions are made.

Solution: Ensure greater transparency by making Medicaid-related information, including provider directories and spending reports, publicly accessible. This will allow taxpayers, caregivers, and advocates to see where resources are going and hold the system accountable.


Unethical Business Practices

Problem: Some providers may be engaging in conflicts of interest or kickback schemes, where services are being recommended for financial gain rather than the needs of individuals. This drives up costs and reduces the quality of care.

Solution: Implement strict ethical oversight to ensure that Medicaid services are provided based on the needs of individuals, without conflicts of interest or unnecessary services that increase costs for taxpayers.


Discriminatory Business Practices in Medicaid Referrals

Problem: Certain providers may be favored in Medicaid referrals, limiting access to care for individuals and creating an unequal playing field for providers. This impacts the freedom of individuals to choose the care that best fits their needs.

Solution: Establish a fair and transparent referral system that treats all providers equally and ensures that individuals have access to a wide range of care options, promoting both choice and competition.

Impact on Disabled Workers


Problem: Disabled workers involved in the Medicaid system are not always being paid fairly, which violates federal labor laws and creates further economic challenges for an already vulnerable group.

Solution: Ensure compliance with federal labor laws by guaranteeing that all disabled workers are paid fairly and treated with respect, helping create a more supportive and ethical Medicaid system.


Limited Consumer Choice

Problem: Some individuals are limited in their ability to choose services or housing arrangements, being tied to specific providers through restrictive agreements. This reduces their freedom to select the care and services that best suit their needs.

Solution: Expand consumer choice by revising policies that restrict beneficiaries to certain providers or housing options, allowing individuals more freedom to select the services and care arrangements that work best for them.


FOIA Violations and Stonewalling

Problem: Public records requests related to Medicaid services and spending are being blocked or delayed, limiting public oversight and reducing accountability within the system.

Solution: Enforce full compliance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to ensure that the public has access to important Medicaid information. This will allow for greater transparency and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used properly.


Unauthorized Care Management Services

Problem: Some individuals are receiving services that have not been authorized or properly managed, leading to confusion and potential misuse of Medicaid funds.

Solution: Ensure proper oversight and clear guidelines for care management services, preventing unauthorized services and ensuring that individuals receive only the care that is necessary and beneficial to them.


Unfair Rental Agreements Linked to Medicaid Services

Problem: Some beneficiaries are tied to specific housing arrangements through rental agreements that are linked to their Medicaid service providers, reducing their ability to change providers or housing without risking their care.

Solution: Revise rental agreements and housing policies to ensure greater consumer freedom and allow individuals to change providers or housing arrangements without being penalized or risking their care.


How These Issues Affect All of Us:

These problems extend beyond any one state—they have national implications for how Medicaid funds are spent and how care is provided. Every taxpayer contributes to Medicaid, and it’s essential that these funds are used efficiently and transparently. At the same time, vulnerable populations—including individuals with disabilities and those relying on Medicaid services—deserve a system that works for them.

By addressing these systemic challenges, we can ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and that those who need support get access to the care and services they deserve.


What You Can Do:

Share this post to raise awareness and encourage others to understand how these issues might be affecting them and their communities.

Support greater transparency and ethical oversight in Medicaid services by engaging with policymakers.

Advocate for positive reform to ensure taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that vulnerable individuals get the care they need.

Together, we can help create a Medicaid system that benefits everyone—by ensuring accountability, promoting transparency, and protecting taxpayer resources while supporting those who rely on these essential services.



 


What Happens When You Lose Medicaid Insurance?

Medicaid is essential for many families. If it’s taken away or you lose it, it can lead to serious problems for you, your family, and even your entire community. Here’s what happens:


You Can’t See the Doctor When You Need To

  • You Delay Care: You might put off going to the doctor because you can’t afford it. Small problems can turn into big ones.

  • No More Preventive Check-ups: Without Medicaid, you might skip regular check-ups that help catch problems early.


You Can’t Afford Medications

  • Stopping Medication: People stop taking important medications (for conditions like diabetes, mental health issues, or high blood pressure) because they can’t pay for them.

  • Getting Worse: Without those meds, your health can get worse quickly, leading to hospital visits or even life-threatening conditions.


Mental Health Suffers

  • Stopping Therapy: Mental health services, like therapy or counseling, can get too expensive, meaning people can no longer get help for anxiety, depression, or other issues.

  • Emotional Stress: Without professional help, mental health issues can become overwhelming, leading to stress, breakdowns, and even suicidal thoughts.


Risk of Homelessness Increases

  • Losing Your Job: If your health gets worse, you may not be able to work, leading to job loss and financial problems.

  • Can’t Pay for Housing: Medical bills pile up, and without income, you might not be able to pay rent or the mortgage, which can lead to losing your home.

  • Families Can Be Affected: It’s not just individuals who suffer—entire families can end up in shelters or homeless because of high medical costs.


Emergency Rooms Get Overcrowded

  • Using ER as a Doctor’s Office: People without insurance often wait until they are very sick and then go to the ER, which is much more expensive than regular care.

  • More Stress on Hospitals: Hospitals can get overwhelmed, and this affects everyone. It means longer wait times and less attention for those who really need emergency care.


Crime Can Increase

  • Desperation Leads to Survival Crimes: When people are financially desperate due to health issues, some may turn to petty crime just to survive.

  • Substance Abuse: Losing mental health care can lead to drug or alcohol use to cope, and this often leads to trouble with the law.

  • Homelessness and Crime Connection: When people lose their homes and can’t get help, they may be more likely to get involved in crime just to meet basic needs.


Your Community Suffers

  • Spread of Illness: Without insurance, people may not get vaccinated or treated for contagious diseases, which can make the entire community sick.

  • Public Services Overloaded: Charities, shelters, and food banks may get overwhelmed by more people needing help, making it harder to serve everyone.

  • Fewer Resources for Everyone: When hospitals, clinics, and public health services are stretched too thin, everyone gets worse care.


Children Are Affected

  • Missed Vaccines and Checkups: Kids without Medicaid miss important vaccines and doctor visits, putting their health and development at risk.

  • Struggling in School: Without proper healthcare, children may fall behind in school because of untreated health problems or stress at home due to financial instability.


Long-Term Poverty

  • Medical Debt: Without Medicaid, medical bills pile up, and families can end up with huge debt, making it hard to afford basic needs like food and housing.

  • Generational Impact: Families in debt or struggling with health issues have a harder time getting out of poverty, and this can affect future generations.


Losing Medicaid isn’t just about losing insurance; it’s about losing stability in your life. Without access to healthcare, everything starts to break down—your health, your ability to work, your family’s security, and the community’s well-being. It can even lead to more crime and homelessness as people struggle just to survive.


What Can You Do?

  • Stay Informed: Know your options and stay connected to advocacy groups that support for healthcare rights.

  • Ask for Help: Reach out to community health centers, legal aid, and nonprofits that offer support.

  • Get Involved: Support policies that ensure everyone has access to affordable healthcare.



 

When people lose Medicaid insurance, the effects also significantly impact taxpayers and the overall economy. Here’s a breakdown of how this burden shifts onto taxpayers and why it's important for everyone, even those with insurance, to understand these consequences.


Increased Emergency Room Costs (Taxpayer-Funded)

  • ER Becomes the First Stop: When people without insurance get sick or injured, they often wait until it’s serious and go to the emergency room (ER), which is far more expensive than regular doctor visits.

  • Higher Costs Passed to Taxpayers: ER visits are one of the most expensive ways to treat medical issues, and when uninsured patients can't pay their bills, the hospital absorbs the costs. These costs are often passed on to taxpayers through increased funding needs for hospitals and public healthcare programs.


Higher Local and State Taxes for Public Services

  • Overloaded Public Health Systems: Local and state governments are forced to provide more funding for free clinics, public health programs, shelters, and emergency services when there’s an increase in uninsured people. This leads to higher taxes to cover these services.

  • Community Resources Stretched Thin: When uninsured people need more help from publicly funded services like shelters, food banks, and healthcare clinics, these services require more taxpayer dollars to stay operational. As more people rely on these programs, the costs to taxpayers grow.


Higher Insurance Premiums for Everyone

  • Cost-Shifting in Healthcare: Hospitals often shift the unpaid medical costs of uninsured patients onto private insurers. This drives up the overall cost of healthcare for those who do have insurance.

  • Rising Insurance Premiums: As healthcare providers raise prices to compensate for uninsured patients, taxpayers who buy insurance in the private market may see their premiums go up. This makes healthcare more expensive for everyone, even those who already pay for private insurance.


Increased Government Spending on Medicaid Expansion and Safety Nets

  • Government Must Step In: When people lose Medicaid, they still often need some form of public assistance. Governments may have to increase spending on Medicaid expansion, safety net programs, or even adjust the Medicaid qualifications to help more people. This means more public spending, which comes from taxpayer money.

  • Taxpayer-Funded Subsidies: In some cases, state and federal governments have to provide subsidies for health insurance, and when more people qualify due to losing Medicaid, these costs come from taxpayer funds.


Higher Costs for the Criminal Justice System

  • More People in Jail: As explained earlier, loss of health insurance can lead to an increase in crime, especially as people turn to petty crimes for survival or get involved in substance abuse. This puts more strain on the criminal justice system, which is heavily funded by taxpayer dollars.

  • Mental Health and Substance Abuse in Jail: Many people end up in jail because they don’t have access to mental health or substance abuse treatment. Once in jail, taxpayers must cover the costs of healthcare, housing, and legal processing for these individuals. It’s far more expensive to treat someone in jail than it is to provide preventive care in the community.


Increased Unemployment and Welfare Costs

  • Job Loss Leads to Public Assistance Needs: Without insurance, people’s health often deteriorates, making it hard for them to work. This can lead to job loss and more people relying on welfare programs like unemployment benefits, food stamps, and housing assistance—all of which are funded by taxpayers.

  • Economic Downturn in Communities: When many people lose their jobs due to poor health and medical debt, the local economy suffers. This can reduce tax revenue from income and sales taxes, while increasing the demand for public support programs.


Public Health Crises Require Taxpayer Funding

  • Spread of Diseases: When people don’t have insurance, they often skip vaccinations and preventive care, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Taxpayers end up footing the bill for public health campaigns, disease control efforts, and emergency healthcare interventions during these outbreaks.

  • Community Health Declines: A sicker population puts more strain on public health resources, requiring more public health spending, which comes from local, state, and federal taxpayer funds.


Increased Medical Debt Burden on the Economy

  • Economic Instability for Families: When families accumulate medical debt, they have less money to spend in the local economy. This reduces consumer spending and harms businesses, leading to lower tax revenue from sales taxes.

  • Long-Term Poverty and Dependence on Government Support: As more families fall into long-term poverty due to medical debt, they become dependent on government assistance programs. Taxpayers must contribute more to welfare programs, public housing, and food assistance.


Loss of Workforce Productivity and Tax Revenue

  • Reduced Workforce Participation: As people become sicker without access to healthcare, they are less able to work, leading to a reduction in workforce productivity.

  • Lower Tax Revenues: When fewer people are able to work due to poor health or job loss, there’s a drop in income tax revenues. This means fewer funds are available for important public services, which can lead to higher taxes for everyone else to cover the shortfall.


Losing Medicaid doesn’t just hurt the people directly affected—it shifts the burden onto taxpayers in many ways. The costs of emergency healthcare, public services, criminal justice, welfare programs, and economic downturns all end up being paid for by you, the taxpayer. By ensuring that people maintain access to Medicaid, we can prevent these problems from spiraling out of control and costing everyone more in the long run.


 


Here are the best federal websites to report issues related to delays, denial of assistance, or mismanagement by your state:


1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

Purpose: HHS oversees health-related federal programs like Medicaid. If you’re facing issues with healthcare or other support services, you can report concerns directly here.

Whistleblower Protection Information: HHS Whistleblower Protection Program


2. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Purpose: CMS oversees the Medicaid program and can be contacted if you're having trouble receiving Medicaid-related services.

Complaint Submission: CMS Contact Form


3. Office of the Inspector General (OIG) – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Purpose: The OIG investigates waste, fraud, and abuse in HHS programs, including Medicaid and state-administered programs. You can report any suspected state-level mismanagement of federal funds here.

Report Fraud or Abuse: OIG Hotline


4. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Purpose: GAO audits and investigates how taxpayer dollars are being spent, including state-level programs funded by federal money. You can report concerns related to mismanagement of federal funds here.

Report Fraud, Waste, or Abuse: GAO FraudNet


5. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Civil Rights Division

Purpose: If you believe you’re facing discrimination, such as being denied services because of your race, disability, or other protected categories, you can report it to the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division.

Submit a Complaint: DOJ Civil Rights Online Complaint Form


6. THE WHITE HOUSE




Los mejores sitios web federales para reportar problemas relacionados con retrasos, denegación de asistencia o mala gestión por parte de tu estado:


Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de los EE. UU. (HHS)

Propósito: El HHS supervisa programas federales relacionados con la salud, como Medicaid. Si tienes problemas con los servicios de salud u otros servicios de apoyo, puedes reportar tus inquietudes directamente aquí.

Información sobre Protección de Denunciantes: Programa de Protección de Denunciantes del HHS.


Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid (CMS)

Propósito: CMS supervisa el programa Medicaid y puede ser contactado si tienes dificultades para recibir servicios relacionados con Medicaid.

Envío de Quejas: Formulario de Contacto de CMS.


Oficina del Inspector General (OIG) – Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de EE. UU.

Propósito: La OIG investiga el desperdicio, fraude y abuso en los programas del HHS, incluidos Medicaid y los programas administrados por los estados. Puedes reportar cualquier sospecha de mala gestión de fondos federales a nivel estatal aquí.

Reportar Fraude o Abuso: Línea Directa de la OIG.


Oficina de Responsabilidad Gubernamental de EE. UU. (GAO)

Propósito: La GAO audita e investiga cómo se gastan los fondos de los contribuyentes, incluidos los programas a nivel estatal financiados con dinero federal. Puedes reportar inquietudes relacionadas con la mala gestión de fondos federales aquí.

Reportar Fraude, Despilfarro o Abuso: GAO FraudNet.


Departamento de Justicia de los EE. UU. (DOJ) – División de Derechos Civiles

Propósito: Si crees que estás enfrentando discriminación, como ser denegado de servicios por tu raza, discapacidad u otras categorías protegidas, puedes reportarlo a la División de Derechos Civiles del DOJ.

Presentar una Queja: Formulario de Queja en Línea de Derechos Civiles del DOJ.


LA CASA BLANCA


REPORT MEDICAID PROBLEMS, TROUBLE GETTING MEDICAID HELP, HOW TO REPORT BAD HEALTHCARE, WHERE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT GOVERNMENT HELP, REPORT UNFAIR TREATMENT FOR MEDICAID, HELP WITH MEDICAID DELAYS, HOW TO REPORT MEDICAID FRAUD, REPORT PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE SERVICES, HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT MEDICAID DENIAL, WHO TO CONTACT FOR HEALTHCARE ISSUES, REPORT UNFAIR MEDICAID SERVICES, WHERE TO REPORT MEDICAID ABUSE, MEDICAID SERVICE COMPLAINTS, REPORT GOVERNMENT HELP ISSUES INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON MEDICAID, PROBLEMAS PARA OBTENER AYUDA DE MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR SOBRE MAL SERVICIO MÉDICO, DÓNDE QUEJARSE SOBRE AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL, INFORMAR TRATO INJUSTO EN MEDICAID, AYUDA CON RETRASOS EN MEDICAID, CÓMO INFORMAR FRAUDE EN MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON SERVICIOS DE SALUD, CÓMO QUEJARSE POR DENEGACIÓN DE MEDICAID, A QUIÉN CONTACTAR PARA PROBLEMAS MÉDICOS, INFORMAR SERVICIOS INJUSTOS DE MEDICAID, DÓNDE INFORMAR ABUSO EN MEDICAID, QUEJAS SOBRE SERVICIOS DE MEDICAID, INFORMAR PROBLEMAS CON LA AYUDA GUBERNAMENTAL



 



A Plea to Connecticut’s Leaders: Unite and Fix This Now


To the trusted leaders, representatives, and officials across Connecticut's 169 towns:

We stand at a crossroads. The challenges we face as a state—whether in healthcare, infrastructure, education, or systemic inequality—demand immediate, decisive action. These are not problems that can be delayed or passed on to future generations. The time to act is now, and we are depending on you.


Our communities are looking to you—those in positions of power and influence—as the only ones capable of driving the changes needed. The trust we have placed in you is not just an honor; it is a responsibility. You are the voices and hands that can deliver the solutions we so desperately need.


This is a moment for unity. Regardless of political affiliations, town borders, or differing opinions, we must come together. The people of Connecticut are depending on you to bridge divides and collaborate for the greater good. The divisions that once held back progress must be set aside in favor of a shared commitment to a brighter future.

We implore you: unite in your purpose, work across every boundary, and implement immediate solutions. Your leadership, dedication, and vision are what will make the difference. There is no room for inaction or delay. Together, you have the power to fix this—to uplift Connecticut, to strengthen our communities, and to restore faith in our future.

The path forward begins now, with your decision to act. We trust in your leadership and we stand behind you as you take these necessary steps.


For the good of all people in Connecticut, for the generations to come—let’s fix this together.



Connecticut State Senate:

John Fonfara - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1

Luis Delgado - Green, District 1

Douglas McCrory - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2

Kristin Hoffman - Republican, District 2

Saud Anwar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3

Matt Siracusa - Republican, District 3

MD Rahman - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4

Stephen King - Republican, District 4

Derek Slap - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5

Kyla Zimmermann - Republican, District 5

Rick Lopes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6

Tremell Collins - Republican, District 6

John Kissel - Incumbent, Republican, District 7

Cynthia Mangini - Democratic, District 7

Lisa Seminara - Incumbent, Republican, District 8

Paul Honig - Democratic, District 8

Matthew L. Lesser - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9

Gary Winfield - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10

Nyrell Moore - Republican, District 10

Martin Looney - Incumbent, Democratic, District 11

Steve Orosco - Republican, District 11

Christine Cohen - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12

Paul Crisci - Republican, District 12

Jan Hochadel - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13

Elain Cariati - Republican, District 13

James Maroney - Incumbent, Democratic, District 14

Steven Johnstone - Republican, District 14

Joan Hartley - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15

Robert C. Sampson - Incumbent, Republican, District 16

Christopher Robertson - Democratic, District 16

Jorge Cabrera - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17

Heather Somers - Incumbent, Republican, District 18

Andrew Parrella - Democratic, District 18

Catherine Osten - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19

Jason Guidone - Republican, District 19

Martha Marx - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20

Shaun Mastroianni - Republican, District 20

Kevin C. Kelly - Incumbent, Republican, District 21

Chris Carrena - Republican, District 22

Sujata Gadkar-Wilcox - Democratic, District 22

Robert E. Halstead - Independent, District 22

Herron Gaston - Incumbent, Democratic, District 23

Brian Banacowski - Republican, District 23

Julie Kushner - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24

Michelle Coelho - Republican, District 24

Bob Duff - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25

Martin Tagliaferro - Republican, District 25

Ceci Maher - Incumbent, Democratic, District 26

Kami Evans - Republican, District 26

Patricia Miller - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27

Nicola Tarzia - Republican, District 27

Tony Hwang - Incumbent, Republican, District 28

Rob Blanchard - Democratic, District 28

Mae Flexer - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29

Chris Reddy - Republican, District 29

Stephen Harding, Jr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 30

Justin Potter - Democratic, District 30

Henri Martin - Incumbent, Republican, District 31

Eric Berthel - Incumbent, Republican, District 32

Jeff Desmarais - Democratic, District 32

Norm Needleman - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33

Jeff Duigou - Republican, District 33

Paul Cicarella, Jr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 34

Brandi Mandato - Democratic, District 34

David Bedell - Green, District 34

Jeff Gordon - Incumbent, Republican, District 35

Merry Garrett - Democratic, District 35

Ryan Fazio - Incumbent, Republican, District 36

Nick Simmons - Democratic, District 36


Connecticut House of Representatives:

Matthew Ritter - Incumbent, Democratic, District 1

Raghib Allie-Brennan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 2

Bradley Koltz - Republican, District 2

Minnie Gonzalez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 3

Julio Concepcion - Incumbent, Democratic, District 4

Maryam Khan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 5

James B. Sánchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 6

Alyssa Peterson - Independent, District 6

Joshua Malik Hall - Incumbent, Democratic, District 7

Tim Ackert - Incumbent, Republican, District 8

Nancy Hammarstrom - Democratic, District 8

Jason Rojas - Incumbent, Democratic, District 9

Henry Genga - Incumbent, Democratic, District 10

Chris Tierinni - Republican, District 10

Salema Davis - Republican, District 11

Patrick Biggins - Democratic, District 11

Geoff Luxenberg - Incumbent, Democratic, District 12

Robert Cormier - Republican, District 12

Joseph Young - Independent, District 12

Jason Doucette - Incumbent, Democratic, District 13

Donna Meier - Republican, District 13

Tom Delnicki - Incumbent, Republican, District 14

Steven King Jr. - Democratic, District 14

Marek Kozikowski - United Community Party, District 14

Bobby Gibson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 15

Quentin Johnson - Republican, District 15

Melissa E. Osborne - Incumbent, Democratic, District 16

Michael Schulitz - Republican, District 16

Eleni Kavros DeGraw - Incumbent, Democratic, District 17

Manju Gerber - Republican, District 17

Jillian Gilchrest - Incumbent, Democratic, District 18

Tammy Exum - Incumbent, Democratic, District 19

Kate Farrar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 20

Mike Demicco - Incumbent, Democratic, District 21

Johnny Carrier - Republican, District 21

Francis Rexford Cooley - Incumbent, Republican, District 22

Rebecca Martinez - Democratic, District 22

Devin Carney - Incumbent, Republican, District 23

Jane Wisialowski - Democratic, District 23

Manny Sanchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 24

Alden Russell - Republican, District 24

Alfred Mayo - Independent, District 24

Bobby Sanchez - Incumbent, Democratic, District 25

Jamie Vaughan - Republican, District 25

Barbara Marino - Republican, District 26

David DeFronzo - Democratic, District 26

Gary Turco - Incumbent, Democratic, District 27

Stephen Ellis - Independent, District 27

Amy Morrin Bello - Incumbent, Democratic, District 28

William Davidson - Republican, District 28

Kerry Szeps Wood - Incumbent, Democratic, District 29

Ed Charamut - Republican, District 29

Donna Veach - Incumbent, Republican, District 30

Jill Barry - Incumbent, Democratic, District 31

Kevin Nursick - Republican, District 31

Christie Carpino - Incumbent, Republican, District 32

Brandon Chafee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 33

Christine Rebstock - Independent, District 33

Irene Haines - Incumbent, Republican, District 34

Richard Knotek - Democratic, District 34

Chris Aniskovich - Incumbent, Republican, District 35

Cinzia Lettieri - Democratic, District 35

Kathryn Russell - Republican, District 36

Renee Muir - Democratic, District 36

Holly Cheeseman - Incumbent, Republican, District 37

Nick Menapace - Democratic, District 37

Kathleen McCarty - Incumbent, Republican, District 38

Nick Gauthier - Democratic, District 38

Anthony Nolan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 39

Beloved Carter - Republican, District 39

Christine Conley - Incumbent, Democratic, District 40

Susan Deane-Shinbrot - Republican, District 40

Aundré Bumgardner - Incumbent, Democratic, District 41

Kim Healy - Republican, District 42

Savet Constantine - Democratic, District 42

Greg Howard - Incumbent, Republican, District 43

Ty Lamb - Democratic, District 43

Anne Dauphinais - Incumbent, Republican, District 44

Samantha Derenthal - Democratic, District 44

Brian Lanoue - Incumbent, Republican, District 45

Kayla Thompson - Democratic, District 45

Derell Wilson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 46

Nick Casiano - Republican, District 46

Doug Dubitsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 47

Aaron Spruance - Democratic, District 47

Mark DeCaprio - Incumbent, Republican, District 48

Christopher Rivers - Democratic, District 48

Lance Lusignan - Independent, District 48

Susan Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 49

Pat Boyd - Incumbent, Democratic, District 50

Chris Stewart - Republican, District 51

Renee Waldron - Democratic, District 51

Kurt Vail - Incumbent, Republican, District 52

Ethan Werstler - Democratic, District 52

Tammy Nuccio - Incumbent, Republican, District 53

Ann Bonney - Democratic, District 53

Gregory Haddad - Incumbent, Democratic, District 54

Aaron Bowman - Republican, District 54

Steve Weir - Incumbent, Republican, District 55

Amanda Veneziano - Democratic, District 55

Kevin Brown - Incumbent, Democratic, District 56

Brian Motola - Republican, District 56

Jaime Foster - Incumbent, Democratic, District 57

Jennifer Dzen - Republican, District 57

Robert Hendrickson - Republican, District 58

John Santanella - Democratic, District 58

Carol Hall - Incumbent, Republican, District 59

Rick LeBorious - Democratic, District 59

Jane Garibay - Incumbent, Democratic, District 60

Len Walker - Republican, District 60

Tami Zawistowski - Incumbent, Republican, District 61

Michael Malloy - Democratic, District 61

Mark Anderson - Incumbent, Republican, District 62

Kim Becker - Democratic, District 62

Jay Case - Incumbent, Republican, District 63

Maria Horn - Incumbent, Democratic, District 64

Barbara Breor - Republican, District 64

Michelle Cook - Incumbent, Democratic, District 65

Joe Canino - Republican, District 65

Karen Reddington-Hughes - Incumbent, Republican, District 66

Sharon Sherman - Democratic, District 66

William Buckbee - Incumbent, Republican, District 67

Alexandra Thomas - Democratic, District 67

Joe Polletta - Incumbent, Republican, District 68

Jason Buchsbaum - Republican, District 69

Ed Edelson - Democratic, District 69

Seth Bronko - Incumbent, Republican, District 70

Jeff Litke - Democratic, District 70

William Pizzuto - Incumbent, Republican, District 71

Larry Butler - Incumbent, Democratic, District 72

Ronald Napoli Jr. - Incumbent, Democratic, District 73

Abigail Diaz Pizarro - Republican, District 73

Michael DiGiovancarlo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 74

Geraldo Reyes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 75

John Piscopo - Incumbent, Republican, District 76

Stephen Simonin - Democratic, District 76

Cara Pavalock-D'Amato - Incumbent, Republican, District 77

Mary Rydingsward - Working Families Party, District 77

Joe Hoxha - Incumbent, Republican, District 78

Mary Fortier - Incumbent, Democratic, District 79

David Schrager - Republican, District 79

Gale Mastrofrancesco - Incumbent, Republican, District 80

Christopher Poulos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 81

James Morelli Jr. - Republican, District 81

Michael Quinn - Incumbent, Democratic, District 82

Lamar Terrell - Republican, District 82

Jonathan Fazzino - Incumbent, Democratic, District 83

Joseph Vollano - Republican, District 83

Hilda Santiago - Incumbent, Democratic, District 84

Mary Mushinsky - Incumbent, Democratic, District 85

Jerry Farrell - Republican, District 85

Vincent Candelora - Incumbent, Republican, District 86

Dave Yaccarino Sr. - Incumbent, Republican, District 87

Kieran Ahern - Democratic, District 87

Joshua Elliott - Incumbent, Democratic, District 88

Lezlye Zupkus - Incumbent, Republican, District 89

Craig Fishbein - Incumbent, Republican, District 90

Rebecca Hyland - Democratic, District 90

Laurie Sweet - Democratic, District 91

Patricia Dillon - Incumbent, Democratic, District 92

Morris Sumpter - Republican, District 92

Toni Walker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 93

Steven Winter - Incumbent, Democratic, District 94

Juan Candelaria - Incumbent, Democratic, District 95

Roland J. Lemar - Incumbent, Democratic, District 96

Alphonse Paolillo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 97

Moira Rader - Incumbent, Democratic, District 98

Joseph Zullo - Incumbent, Republican, District 99

Kai Juanna Belton - Incumbent, Democratic, District 100

Nigel Macon-Wilson - Republican, District 100

John-Michael Parker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101

Lisa Deane - Republican, District 101

Robin Comey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102

Ray Ingraham - Republican, District 102

Liz Linehan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103

Kara Rochelle - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104

David Cassetti - Republican, District 104

Nicole Klarides-Ditria - Incumbent, Republican, District 105

Mitch Bolinsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 106

Michelle Embree Ku - Democratic, District 106

Marty Foncello - Incumbent, Republican, District 107

Aaron Zimmer - Democratic, District 107

Pat Callahan - Incumbent, Republican, District 108

Anne Weisberg - Democratic, District 108

Farley Santos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109

Brenda Santopolo Hefferon - Republican, District 109

Bob Godfrey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110

Austin Monteiro - Republican, District 110

Aimee Berger-Girvalo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111

Colette Kabasakalian - Republican, District 111

Tony Scott - Incumbent, Republican, District 112

Beth Cliff - Democratic, District 112

Jason Perillo - Incumbent, Republican, District 113

Mary Welander - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114

William Heffernan III - Democratic, District 115

Silvana Apicella - Republican, District 115

Treneé McGee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116

Raymond Collins III - Republican, District 117

MJ Shannon - Democratic, District 117

Frank Smith - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118

Mark Macchio - Republican, District 118

Kathy Kennedy - Incumbent, Republican, District 119

Etan Hirsch - Democratic, District 119

Laura Dancho - Incumbent, Republican, District 120

Kaitlyn Shake - Democratic, District 120

Joe Gresko - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121

Rafael Irizarry - Republican, District 121

Ben McGorty - Incumbent, Republican, District 122

Dorothy Lerner - Democratic, District 122

David Rutigliano - Incumbent, Republican, District 123

Tom Tesoro - Democratic, District 123

Andre Baker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124

Yoshiyahu Yisrael - Republican, District 124

Tom O'Dea - Incumbent, Republican, District 125

Jason Bennett - Democratic, District 125

Fred Gee Jr. - Incumbent, Democratic, District 126

David Herz - Republican, District 126

Marcus Brown - Incumbent, Democratic, District 127

Christopher Rosario - Incumbent, Democratic, District 128

Ramona Marquez - Republican, District 128

Angel Gonzalez - Independent, District 128

Steven Stafstrom - Incumbent, Democratic, District 129

Francis Kalangala - Republican, District 129

Antonio Felipe - Incumbent, Democratic, District 130

Terry Sullivan - Republican, District 130

Arnold Jensen - Republican, District 131

Ellen Fox - Democratic, District 131

Jennifer Leeper - Incumbent, Democratic, District 132

Alexis Harrison - Republican, District 132

Cristin Vahey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 133

Chris Verras - Republican, District 133

Sarah Keitt - Incumbent, Democratic, District 134

Melissa Longo - Republican, District 134

Anne Hughes - Incumbent, Democratic, District 135

Christopher Peritore - Republican, District 135

Jonathan Steinberg - Incumbent, Democratic, District 136

John Bolton - Republican, District 136

Kadeem Roberts - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137

Pietro Rotondo - Republican, District 137

Rachel Chaleski - Incumbent, Republican, District 138

Kenneth Gucker - Democratic, District 138

Kevin Ryan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139

Mark Adams - Republican, District 139

Travis Simms - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140

Enrique Santiago - Republican, District 140

Carleton Giles - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary)

Tracy Marra - Incumbent, Republican, District 141

Sheila Quinn - Democratic, District 141

Lucy Dathan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142

Tricia Massucco - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew)

Dominique Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143

Peter Bang - Republican, District 143

Hubert Delany - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144

Layne Rodney - Republican, District 144

Corey Paris - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145

Fritz Blau - Republican, District 145

Jim Malerba - Republican, District 146

Eilish Collins Main - Democratic, District 146

Matt Blumenthal - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147

Rudy Settimi - Republican, District 147

Olga Anastos - Republican, District 148

Jonathan Jacobson - Democratic, District 148

Anabel Figueroa - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary)

Rachel Khanna - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149

Tina Courpas - Republican, District 149

Steve Meskers - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150

Paul Cappiali - Republican, District 150

Hector Arzeno - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151

Tod Laudonia - Republican, District 151

Steve Meskers - Incumbent, Democratic, District 150

Paul Cappiali - Republican, District 150

Hector Arzeno - Incumbent, Democratic, District 151

Tod Laudonia - Republican, District 151

Matt Blumenthal - Incumbent, Democratic, District 147

Rudy Settimi - Republican, District 147

Olga Anastos - Republican, District 148

Jonathan Jacobson - Democratic, District 148

Anabel Figueroa - Democratic, District 148 (Lost in Primary)

Rachel Khanna - Incumbent, Democratic, District 149

Tina Courpas - Republican, District 149

Corey Paris - Incumbent, Democratic, District 145

Fritz Blau - Republican, District 145

Hubert Delany - Incumbent, Democratic, District 144

Layne Rodney - Republican, District 144

Peter Bang - Republican, District 143

Dominique Johnson - Incumbent, Democratic, District 143

Tricia Massucco - Republican, District 142 (Withdrew)

Lucy Dathan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 142

Sheila Quinn - Democratic, District 141

Tracy Marra - Incumbent, Republican, District 141

Carleton Giles - Democratic, District 140 (Lost in Primary)

Enrique Santiago - Republican, District 140

Travis Simms - Incumbent, Democratic, District 140

Mark Adams - Republican, District 139

Kevin Ryan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 139

Kenneth Gucker - Democratic, District 138

Rachel Chaleski - Incumbent, Republican, District 138

Pietro Rotondo - Republican, District 137

Kadeem Roberts - Incumbent, Democratic, District 137

John-Michael Parker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 101

Lisa Deane - Republican, District 101

Robin Comey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 102

Ray Ingraham - Republican, District 102

Liz Linehan - Incumbent, Democratic, District 103

Kara Rochelle - Incumbent, Democratic, District 104

David Cassetti - Republican, District 104

Nicole Klarides-Ditria - Incumbent, Republican, District 105

Mitch Bolinsky - Incumbent, Republican, District 106

Michelle Embree Ku - Democratic, District 106

Marty Foncello - Incumbent, Republican, District 107

Aaron Zimmer - Democratic, District 107

Pat Callahan - Incumbent, Republican, District 108

Anne Weisberg - Democratic, District 108

Farley Santos - Incumbent, Democratic, District 109

Brenda Santopolo Hefferon - Republican, District 109

Bob Godfrey - Incumbent, Democratic, District 110

Austin Monteiro - Republican, District 110

Aimee Berger-Girvalo - Incumbent, Democratic, District 111

Colette Kabasakalian - Republican, District 111

Tony Scott - Incumbent, Republican, District 112

Beth Cliff - Democratic, District 112

Jason Perillo - Incumbent, Republican, District 113

Mary Welander - Incumbent, Democratic, District 114

William Heffernan III - Democratic, District 115

Silvana Apicella - Republican, District 115

Treneé McGee - Incumbent, Democratic, District 116

Raymond Collins III - Republican, District 117

MJ Shannon - Democratic, District 117

Frank Smith - Incumbent, Democratic, District 118

Mark Macchio - Republican, District 118

Kathy Kennedy - Incumbent, Republican, District 119

Etan Hirsch - Democratic, District 119

Laura Dancho - Incumbent, Republican, District 120

Kaitlyn Shake - Democratic, District 120

Joe Gresko - Incumbent, Democratic, District 121

Rafael Irizarry - Republican, District 121

Ben McGorty - Incumbent, Republican, District 122

Dorothy Lerner - Democratic, District 122

David Rutigliano - Incumbent, Republican, District 123

Tom Tesoro - Democratic, District 123

Andre Baker - Incumbent, Democratic, District 124

Yoshiyahu Yisrael - Republican, District 124


Joe Biden – President of the United States

  • The president holds the highest office and has significant executive power, including signing legislation, issuing executive orders, and shaping both domestic and foreign policy.


Kamala Harris – Vice President of the United States

  • The vice president serves as the president of the Senate and has the power to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate.


Antony Blinken – Secretary of State

  • As the nation's top diplomat, Blinken influences U.S. foreign policy and global relations.


Janet Yellen – Secretary of the Treasury

  • Yellen leads the Treasury Department, overseeing the U.S. economy, including financial regulation, federal spending, and monetary policy.


Merrick Garland – Attorney General

  • Garland heads the U.S. Department of Justice and plays a crucial role in enforcing federal laws, including civil rights and criminal law.


Lloyd Austin – Secretary of Defense

  • Austin oversees the U.S. military and is responsible for national defense policies and military operations worldwide.


Xavier Becerra – Secretary of Health and Human Services

  • Becerra directs federal health policies and oversees key health-related agencies, including Medicare and Medicaid.

Alejandro Mayorkas – Secretary of Homeland Security

  • Mayorkas leads efforts to safeguard the U.S. from internal and external threats, including cybersecurity, border security, and disaster response.


Jerome Powell – Chairman of the Federal Reserve

  • Powell influences U.S. monetary policy, including interest rates and economic stability, through his leadership at the Federal Reserve.


Chuck Schumer – Senate Majority Leader

  • Schumer sets the legislative agenda in the Senate and plays a key role in guiding bills to passage.


Mitch McConnell – Senate Minority Leader

  • As the leader of the minority party in the Senate, McConnell influences legislative strategy and opposition.


Kevin McCarthy – Speaker of the House of Representatives

  • The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House and influences which bills come to the floor for a vote.


Hakeem Jeffries – House Minority Leader

  • Jeffries leads the Democratic caucus in the House and works to shape legislative priorities for his party.


Nancy Pelosi – Former Speaker of the House

  • Although no longer Speaker, Pelosi continues to wield significant influence in the House as a senior Democratic leader.


Ron Klain – White House Chief of Staff

  • As the president’s top advisor, Klain plays a crucial role in shaping policy and managing the executive branch.


Pete Buttigieg – Secretary of Transportation

  • Buttigieg oversees national transportation policy, infrastructure projects, and initiatives related to sustainability and innovation.

Gina Raimondo – Secretary of Commerce

  • Raimondo plays a key role in promoting economic growth, job creation, and regulating commerce and trade.


Rochelle Walensky – Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • Walensky leads public health efforts, including managing responses to health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.


John Roberts – Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

  • Roberts leads the judiciary and presides over major cases that can shape U.S. laws for generations.


Lina Khan – Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

  • Khan has significant influence over antitrust enforcement, consumer protection, and regulating large tech companies.


 

Andover, Ansonia, Ashford, Avon, Barkhamsted, Beacon Falls, Berlin, Bethany, Bethel, Bethlehem, Bloomfield, Bolton, Bozrah, Branford, Bridgeport, Bridgewater, Bristol, Brookfield, Brooklyn, Burlington, Canaan, Canterbury, Canton, Chaplin, Cheshire, Chester, Clinton, Colchester, Colebrook, Columbia, Cornwall, Coventry, Cromwell, Danbury, Darien, Deep River, Derby, Durham, Eastford, East Granby, East Haddam, East Hampton, East Hartford, East Haven, East Lyme, Easton, East Windsor, Ellington, Enfield, Essex, Fairfield, Farmington, Franklin, Glastonbury, Goshen, Granby, Greenwich, Griswold, Groton, Guilford, Haddam, Hamden, Hampton, Hartford, Hartland, Harwinton, Hebron, Kent, Killingly, Killingworth, Lebanon, Ledyard, Lisbon, Litchfield, Lyme, Madison, Manchester, Mansfield, Marlborough, Meriden, Middlebury, Middlefield, Middletown, Milford, Monroe, Montville, Morris, Naugatuck, New Britain, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Hartford, New Haven, Newington, New London, New Milford, Newtown, Norfolk, North Branford, North Canaan, North Haven, North Stonington, Norwalk, Norwich, Old Lyme, Old Saybrook, Orange, Oxford, Plainfield, Plainville, Plymouth, Pomfret, Portland, Preston, Prospect, Putnam, Redding, Ridgefield, Rocky Hill, Roxbury, Salem, Salisbury, Scotland, Seymour, Sharon, Shelton, Sherman, Simsbury, Somers, Southbury, Southington, South Windsor, Sprague, Stafford, Stamford, Sterling, Stonington, Stratford, Suffield, Thomaston, Thompson, Tolland, Torrington, Trumbull, Union, Vernon, Voluntown, Wallingford, Warren, Washington, Waterbury, Waterford, Watertown, Westbrook, West Hartford, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wethersfield, Willington, Wilton, Winchester, Windham, Windsor, Windsor Locks, Wolcott, Woodbridge, Woodbury, Woodstock. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming.



Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Resources: Empowering Individuals with Brain Injuries to Achieve Optimal Living

Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) is a debilitating condition that affects individuals physically, cognitively, and emotionally. ABI survivors often face a lengthy and arduous recovery process, which can result in feelings of isolation and uncertainty about the future. Fortunately, ABI Resources is here to assist.

ABI Resources is an organization committed to offering support and resources to individuals with ABI, as well as their families and caregivers. Their mission is to empower ABI survivors to achieve optimal living, and they accomplish this by providing a variety of programs and services tailored to each individual's unique needs.

A key component of ABI Resources' assistance is their community-based programs. These programs offer survivors the opportunity to engage with others who have similar experiences and to participate in activities that promote physical, cognitive, and emotional wellness. From art therapy to yoga classes to support groups, ABI Resources provides a wide range of programs that help survivors build confidence, improve their skills, and connect with others.
In addition to their community-based programs, ABI Resources also offers individualized support services. These services are designed to help survivors navigate the challenges they may face in their daily lives, such as managing finances, finding employment, or accessing medical care. The organization's team of trained professionals works closely with each individual to create a personalized plan that addresses their specific needs and goals.

One of the most inspiring aspects of ABI Resources is their commitment to education and awareness. They understand that many people are unfamiliar with ABI and its impact on individuals and families, and they work tirelessly to increase public awareness and understanding of the condition. Through their outreach programs and educational resources, ABI Resources helps to break down the stigma surrounding ABI and to promote understanding and compassion.

At the heart of ABI Resources is a deep commitment to the individuals they serve. They understand that each person's journey is unique, and they are dedicated to providing personalized support and resources to help survivors of ABI live fulfilling and meaningful lives. Whether it's through community-based programs, individualized support services, or education and awareness initiatives, ABI Resources is making a real difference in the lives of individuals and families impacted by ABI.

In conclusion, ABI Resources is an organization that inspires hope and empowerment for individuals with ABI. Their commitment to community, education, and individualized support services helps to ensure that survivors of ABI have the tools and resources they need to live their best lives. By raising awareness and breaking down stigmas surrounding ABI, ABI Resources is making a meaningful impact in the lives of those affected by this condition.

ABI Resources is a reputable organization that provides exceptional support to individuals and families in collaboration with various government agencies and community service providers, including the Connecticut Department of Social Services DSS, COU Community Options, the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services DMHAS, Connecticut Community Care CCC CCCI Southwestern Connecticut Area on Aging SWCAA, Western Connecticut Area on Aging WCAAA, Allied Community Resources ACR, Access Health, and United Services. ABI Resources collaborates care with renowned institutions such as UCONN, Yale, and Hartford. As a community care and supported living provider, ABI Resources is dedicated to offering high-quality and personalized care to enhance the lives of those it serves. Medicaid MFP Money Follows the person program / ABI Waiver Program / PCA waiver.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this platform.

ABI Resources does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, opinions, or other information that may be mentioned on this platform. Reliance on any information provided is solely at your own risk.

The use of this platform does not create a doctor-patient relationship or any other type of healthcare provider-patient relationship. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor, a medical professional, or your local emergency number immediately.
 
In summary, ABI Resources is a reliable and dedicated organization that helps individuals with acquired brain injuries to achieve optimal living. By providing community-based programs, individualized support services, and educational resources, ABI Resources is making a significant impact on the lives of those affected by this condition. Their unwavering commitment to raising awareness and breaking down stigmas surrounding ABI ensures that survivors have the necessary tools and resources to live their best lives. Through collaboration with various government agencies, community service providers, and esteemed institutions, ABI Resources continues to enhance the lives of the individuals and families they serve.

Homemaker Companion Agency Registration: HCA.0001017

 

ABI RESOURCES CONNECTICUT

CT DSS ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY ABI WAIVER AND MFP AGENCY PROVIDER.

CT SUPPORTED LIVING AND COMMUNITY CARE LEADERS.

BRAIN INJURY COMMUNITY OF CONNECTICUT BICC

DISABILITY RIGHTS OF CONNECTICUT ADVOCATES



 

bottom of page