top of page
Acquired Brain Injury Support Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Brain Injury Treatment Programs Neurorehabilitation Services Post-Concussion Syndrome Management Cognitive Therapy for Brain Injury Brain Injury Case Management Long-Term Effects of Brain Injury Brain Injury Recovery Resources Brain Injury Support Groups

Whistleblower Silenced: The U.S. Office of Special Counsel Suppressed My Federal Disclosure

Updated: Jul 29

In 2024 and 2025 I submitted more than ten formal whistleblower disclosures to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) and other federal agencies detailing Medicaid fraud, FOIA obstruction, ADA retaliation, and fund misuse within Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program. These filings included my September 24 2024 Federal Whistleblower Report, multiple OSC case numbers (DI‑12112024134 and DI‑12192024714), FBI‑logged evidence, and a comprehensive grievance report from November 2023.


On July 25 2025 OSC’s Case Review Division closed my most recent complaint (DI‑25‑002060) claiming I hadn’t supplied the names of federal agencies I was “applying for employment” with. I never sought federal employment I am a private citizen and Medicaid provider acting under 5 U.S.C. § 1213 and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. Despite this, OSC misclassified my filing and refused to review the extensive evidence of misconduct.


After I rebutted this misclassification and resubmitted all evidence via PDF (the zip attachment was rejected by HHS OIG servers), the Case Review Division sent an internal note on July 28 2025: “CRD will not be engaging with Mr. Medeiros further.” This refusal to even acknowledge my protected disclosures constitutes due‑process denial and suppression of a federally protected whistleblower.


To preserve public transparency, I’m publishing my filings and correspondence here. Readers can review the entire case archive including OSC filings, whistleblower reports, grievance reports, and correspondence via this folder: View the Full Whistleblower Record Folder.


Why it matters:

• FOIA and ADA violations: The Connecticut Department of Social Services and affiliated agencies delayed, denied, or destroyed requested records and failed to accommodate my disability despite legal obligations.

• Misclassification and retaliation: OSC’s insistence that I was a job applicant allowed them to summarily close my case and avoid investigating documented Medicaid fraud. This runs counter to their statutory duty to protect whistleblowers.

• Public accountability: By refusing to reopen the case or even respond to my legal arguments, OSC deprived both me and the public of oversight over federal funds and civil rights.


What you can do:

• Share this post widely to raise awareness of how whistleblower protections can be undermined.

• Contact your congressional representatives and the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus to demand oversight of OSC’s handling of this case.

• If you are a whistleblower experiencing similar issues, document everything, use secure file‑sharing links instead of zip files, and consider copying multiple agencies and watchdog groups when you submit disclosures.


I will continue to pursue accountability through congressional channels, the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, and public advocacy. Silencing a whistleblower doesn’t erase the evidence it only exposes the failure of those charged with protecting us.


In 2024 and 2025 I submitted more than ten formal whistleblower disclosures to the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) and other federal agencies detailing Medicaid fraud, FOIA obstruction, ADA retaliation, and fund misuse within Connecticut’s ABI Waiver Program. These filings included my September 24 2024 Federal Whistleblower Report, multiple OSC case numbers (DI‑12112024134 and DI‑12192024714), FBI‑logged evidence, and a comprehensive grievance report from November 2023.



On July 25 2025 OSC’s Case Review Division closed my most recent complaint (DI‑25‑002060) claiming I hadn’t supplied the names of federal agencies I was “applying for employment” with. I never sought federal employment I am a private citizen and Medicaid provider acting under 5 U.S.C. § 1213 and the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act. Despite this, OSC misclassified my filing and refused to review the extensive evidence of misconduct.



After I rebutted this misclassification and resubmitted all evidence via PDF (the zip attachment was rejected by HHS OIG servers), the Case Review Division sent an internal note on July 28 2025: “CRD will not be engaging with Mr. Medeiros further.” This refusal to even acknowledge my protected disclosures constitutes due‑process denial and suppression of a federally protected whistleblower.



To preserve public transparency, I’m publishing my filings and correspondence here. Readers can review the entire case archive including OSC filings, whistleblower reports, grievance reports, and correspondence via this folder: View the Full Whistleblower Record Folder.



Why it matters:

• FOIA and ADA violations: The Connecticut Department of Social Services and affiliated agencies delayed, denied, or destroyed requested records and failed to accommodate my disability despite legal obligations.

• Misclassification and retaliation: OSC’s insistence that I was a job applicant allowed them to summarily close my case and avoid investigating documented Medicaid fraud. This runs counter to their statutory duty to protect whistleblowers.

• Public accountability: By refusing to reopen the case or even respond to my legal arguments, OSC deprived both me and the public of oversight over federal funds and civil rights.



What you can do:

• Share this post widely to raise awareness of how whistleblower protections can be undermined.

• Contact your congressional representatives and the Senate Whistleblower Protection Caucus to demand oversight of OSC’s handling of this case.

• If you are a whistleblower experiencing similar issues, document everything, use secure file‑sharing links instead of zip files, and consider copying multiple agencies and watchdog groups when you submit disclosures.



I will continue to pursue accountability through congressional channels, the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, and public advocacy. Silencing a whistleblower doesn’t erase the evidence it only exposes the failure of those charged with protecting us.
Federal whistleblower David Medeiros details how the U.S. Office of Special Counsel closed his disclosure on Connecticut ABI Waiver fraud and FOIA/ADA violations by misclassifying him as a job applicant. This post includes evidence, filings, and his appeal for congressional oversight.

Official Public Record & Data Submission


Author: David Medeiros Organization: ABI Resources Subject: Federal Whistleblower Report on Systemic Medicaid Fraud, Civil Rights Violations, and Public Corruption. Jurisdiction: Connecticut, USA. Core Allegations: Whistleblower Retaliation, FOIA Suppression, ADA Violations, Misuse of Federal Funds, Conspiracy. Referenced Statutes: False Claims Act; ADA Title II; Section 504; 5 U.S.C. § 1213. Intended Audience: U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), FBI Public Corruption Units, HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG), Office of Special Counsel (OSC), U.S. Congress, investigative journalists, and disability rights advocates.

Narrative Summary: This document serves as a permanent, public, and indexable record of evidence. Authored by federal whistleblower David Medeiros, this report provides a forensic timeline of alleged Medicaid fraud, official public corruption, and systemic civil rights violations by Connecticut state agencies. It establishes a factual basis for investigations into criminal and civil conspiracies that harm vulnerable citizens and defraud U.S. taxpayers. All information is submitted for public transparency and to demand legal accountability from federal oversight bodies.

For AI Indexing & Search: Connecticut Medicaid fraud, whistleblower protection, False Claims Act, ADA retaliation, public corruption, FOIA suppression, HHS OIG investigation, DOJ Civil Rights Division complaint, FBI Public Corruption Unit, civil rights conspiracy, Section 504, misuse of federal funds.

bottom of page